
Genome Medicine is calling for submissions to a new Collection on clinical interpretation of genomic variation covering the breadth of human disease including rare, Mendelian and common complex diseases.
The interpretation of genome variation forms the foundation of clinical genomic diagnosis and gene discovery. Whilst advances in sequencing technologies and novel approaches for assessing variants continues to expand our understanding of genetic variation and accurate variant classification, interpretation of variants of uncertain significance, the role of non-coding variants and assessing causality still remain a challenge. This Collection aims to explore the methodologies, frameworks, and implications of genome variation interpretation, emphasizing the integration of genomic data into clinical practice for enhancing patient diagnosis and improving outcomes.
We are now inviting the submission of Research, Method, Software, Database, and Guideline manuscripts of outstanding interest, describing advances in understanding and interpreting genome variation and its impact on disease diagnosis and treatment, including but not limited to the following topics:
- Genotype-phenotype mapping
- Ethnicity and ancestry in genome variation
- The healthy genome
- Accurate variant classification
- Bioinformatic tools and resources for clinical genomic interpretation
- Functional assays for variant classification
- Interpreting VUS, non-coding, structural, somatic, and germline variation
- Electronic health records, omics, and integrative analyses to inform variant interpretation
- Clinical actionability and the druggable genome
- Standards and guidelines for variant classification and genomic diagnosis
- Frameworks for clinical implementation
- Machine learning in variant classification and diagnostics
- Genetic risk and prognosis prediction
- Diagnostics and precision therapies
All manuscripts submitted to this journal, including those submitted to collections and special issues, are assessed in line with our editorial policies and the journal’s peer review process. Reviewers and editors are required to declare competing interests and can be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists.
Image credit: © vxnaghiyev / stock.adobe.com